Where AI pays off here
We map how work actually moves through your organisation, then rank the workflows by hours consumed, error cost and how tractable they are. The output is a shortlist with numbers attached, not a category list.
Most AI strategy work stops at the slide that says "opportunities". We take it to the point where a finance director can approve it: named workflows, sized benefits, honest costs, a delivery order and the risks written down.
By the time we are called in, most organisations have already spent something on AI. What they are missing is a defensible view of what to do next.
Every consulting engagement is scoped from these. You can take all six or the two that are blocking you.
We map how work actually moves through your organisation, then rank the workflows by hours consumed, error cost and how tractable they are. The output is a shortlist with numbers attached, not a category list.
For each candidate, an honest comparison: what the market already sells, what it would cost to build, what it costs to run, and what happens if you do neither. Some workflows are on the list to be told no.
A phased plan with cost, effort, dependency and expected benefit per phase, sequenced so the early work funds the later work rather than starving it.
Who owns AI decisions, who approves a new tool, where the budget sits, and what an internal capability needs to look like at your size. Most stalled programmes are an ownership problem, not a technology one.
What your systems can actually supply, in what quality, and what has to be fixed before an AI project depends on it. This is where optimistic plans usually break.
Regulatory exposure, data protection, supplier concentration and the reputational cases specific to your sector - assessed early, while the plan can still change cheaply.
The engagement runs with the people who do the work, not around them. Sessions are short, scheduled around delivery, and every stage ends with something you can act on.
You get a named consultant for the whole engagement - the person in the room is the person doing the work.
A half-day with the sponsor and the people who own the work, to agree what the engagement must answer and what would count as a good answer.
Interviews, workflow observation, system and licence review, and a look at the data you would need to rely on.
We put two or three routes in front of you with the trade-offs made explicit, and we argue for one.
The decision is written up as a costed, sequenced roadmap with owners and a first phase small enough to start next month.
Consulting is fixed scope and fixed price. We agree the questions, the access we need and the deliverables before anything starts, so there is no meter running.
Engagements typically run four to eight weeks depending on how many business areas are in scope. Smaller organisations often need a single two-week pass across one department.
We are not a reseller and we take no commission from any vendor. If the right answer is a product you can buy for a few hundred pounds a month, that is what the report will say.
Most consulting engagements begin with a short audit so the advice rests on evidence rather than interviews alone.